FREQUENTLY WIRELESS? THEN EXPECT LESS FREQUENCY
by Edwin J. Somers, CAS
In this article, we will discuss frequencies
available for wireless microphones in the United States.
We are seeing a tremendous increase in the use of wireless
and a decrease in frequency availability. This is causing
an increase in congestion among wireless users as well
as an increase in interference from other users, legal
and otherwise.
The frequencies available for wireless
use include the hydrological band 169-172 MHz, the VHF
television band channels 7 through 13, 174-216 MHz,
and the UHF television band channels 14 through 67,
470-794 MHz. Not all UHF channels are available in all
areas.
We are allowed to transmit on these
frequencies as secondary users. This means if we get
interference from the primary users, such as the broadcasters,
we must move to another frequency.
The FCC has allocated the broadcasters
licenses to operate HDTV transmitters on the UHF television
band. This effectively makes these channels unusable
for radio mics because of the uniform distribution of
power on each channel, as well as the tremendous power
levels involved. We are going to see more and more HDTV
stations on the air as we approach the deadline for
startup.
I am often asked what the industry
is doing about the loss of spectrum, and I do not see
any efforts to obtain or reserve spectrum. I think the
primary reason is the fact that, as operators, we are
not required to have a transmitter license except under
specific circumstances. In the eyes of the Federal Communications
Commission, if we do not have a license, we do not exist.
The one thing that is happening is
that manufacturers are offering very effective multi-frequency
or frequency-agile systems which work exceedingly well
in harsh interference environments.
The transmitting power for VHF transmitters
is limited to 50 mw (milliwatts) in the United States,
and 250 mw for UHF. Most manufacturers limit their UHF
transmitters to about 100 mw due to the reduced battery
life of a higher power transmitter. Some high power
transmitters are offered with multiple batteries.
When operating multiple transmitters,
frequency coordination is mandatory. With single channel
transmitters, it was not much of a problem because the
vendor usually coordinated the frequencies. With frequency-agile
systems, some form of field coordination is required.
All manufacturers have developed coordinating software
for their respective systems and will readily assist
users with coordination, as will the vendors. Some of
the manufacturers even offer the software to the end
users. Now how convenient is that?
back
|